The permanence of Greek civil servants, a practice maintained for 114 years, is now central to the constitutional revision discussions led by Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis. The aim is to counteract the “power of inertia” tied to extensive job security, which has historically obstructed reforms and modernization in the public sector.
Historical Context and Importance of Permanency
The introduction of civil service permanency dates back to 1911 under Eleftherios Venizelos, intended to provide stability during a politically volatile time. Over the years, this protection has created a substantial body of civil servants who function independently of political fluctuations, but it has also led to issues of clientelism and party influence.
Development and Current Status
In Greece, this system has evolved into a significant mechanism for political patronage and clientelism. During the austerity measures following the memoranda, attempts to reduce workforce numbers and implement digitization resulted in layoffs and budget cuts, yet the prevailing trend was to retain the civil service, which is projected to comprise approximately 596,000 employees by 2025.
The Role of ASEP and Recruitment Processes
Despite rigorous hiring protocols enforced by the Supreme Council for Civil Personnel Selection (ASEP), illegal or informal appointments still occur, particularly in local government. While digital reforms and enhanced oversight have increased transparency, job security protections continue to hinder efforts aimed at promoting meritocracy and efficiency.
Potential Changes to Permanency and Legal Considerations
The government intends to propose legislative reforms that would allow for the removal of job security, referencing Article 103 of the Greek Constitution. This article states that civil servants maintain their permanent status as long as their positions exist. If an organizational position is eliminated due to restructuring, the employee may be put on temporary suspension and, if no alternative role is found, ultimately dismissed.
However, putting these changes into practice will require a political consensus and may bring about legal challenges, particularly regarding whether abolishing a position automatically ends the employee’s contract. According to the Greek Constitution, dismissals are permissible only under specific circumstances, such as misconduct, incapacity, or position elimination.
Political and Legal Hurdles
The proposal to revise Article 103 has already encountered resistance from opposition parties, who are calling for increased transparency and discussion. Although the existing digital management and evaluation systems will aid in implementing reforms, the necessary political will and social acceptance remain uncertain.
Conclusions
Eliminating job security in the civil service represents a significant reform that could fundamentally transform Greece’s public administration. If pursued, it must be supported by clear rules, transparent processes, and societal agreement to ensure effectiveness and fairness. The issue of permanency, a historical institution of 114 years, now stands at a pivotal juncture that will impact the future of Greece’s public sector.
Ask Me Anything
Explore Related Questions
